Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts | Login 
  Users Online: 654 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 14-17

Pilot study: Comparing efficacy of 14-day triple therapy Clarithromycin versus levofloxacin on eradication of Helicobacter Pylori infection in Syrian population single-center experience


Department of Digestive Disease, Damascus Hospital, Damascus, Syria

Date of Web Publication12-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Marouf Mohammad Alhalabi
Department of Digestive Disease, Syria-damascus-almoujtahed Street, Damascus Hospital, Damascus
Syria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_70_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Context: Goals: To compare the efficacy of standard triple therapy with clarithromycin versus triple therapy with levofloxacin for treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive infection in a referral hospital in Damascus, Syria. Design: pilot prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Subjects and Methods: Eighty treatment-naive patients who tested positive for H. pylori gastric infection were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups with randomization ratio of 50/50. Group (A) was treated with clarithromycin (500 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg), and esomeprazole (20 mg), each twice/day for 14 days, while Group (B) was treated with levofloxacin (500 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg), and esomeprazole (20 mg), each twice/day for 14 days.[1] After 6 weeks of treatment, all patients underwent endoscopy and biopsy to evaluate H. pylori infection eradication. Results: Forty patients were allocated in each group; 37 patients completed the follow-up in each group. Thirteen patients in Group (A) were cured, with an eradication rate of 35.1% according to per-protocol analysis (PPA) and 32.5% according to intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), while in Group (B), 11 patients were cured, with an eradication rate of 29.7% according to PPA and 27.5% according to ITT with P = 0.80. No serious adverse events reported in both the groups. Conclusions: Clarithromycin is slightly better than levofloxacin in treatment of H. pylori gastric infection, but both regimens show low effectiveness with suboptimal eradication rates in our selected population.

Keywords: Clarithromycin resistance, Clarithromycin, Helicobacter pylori, levofloxacin resistance, levofloxacin, Syria, triple therapy


How to cite this article:
Cheha KM, Dib SO, Alhalabi MM. Pilot study: Comparing efficacy of 14-day triple therapy Clarithromycin versus levofloxacin on eradication of Helicobacter Pylori infection in Syrian population single-center experience. Avicenna J Med 2018;8:14-7

How to cite this URL:
Cheha KM, Dib SO, Alhalabi MM. Pilot study: Comparing efficacy of 14-day triple therapy Clarithromycin versus levofloxacin on eradication of Helicobacter Pylori infection in Syrian population single-center experience. Avicenna J Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 17];8:14-7. Available from: http://www.avicennajmed.com/text.asp?2018/8/1/14/223163




   Introduction Top


Syria is expected to have high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection.[2]H. pylori is Gram-negative spiral-shaped bacteria.[3],[4],[5] Chronic infection causes diseases such as chronic gastritis, duodenal and peptic ulcers,[3] gastric cancer, and primary gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma,[5],[6],[7] which can be cured by eradication of H. pylori.[6],[8] The most used protocols in Syria are triple therapy using clarithromycin or levofloxacin with proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin. There are known resistant types of H. pylori against those drugs around the world,[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] and there is no standard method for testing the susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics. Therefore, due to limited data about the efficacy of those protocols in the Syrian patients, we conduct this trial to evaluate the efficacy of those drugs and report our eradication rate.


   Subjects and Methods Top


The study was carried out from December 2015 to January 2017 in a referral hospital in Damascus, Syria. Study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital, and it was registered as standard randomized clinical trial (Clinicaltrial.gov, identifier-NCT02541786).

Treatment-naive participants were selected from patients who presented to the gastroenterology clinic undergoing gastroscopy for upper gastrointestinal symptoms and had infection of gastric H. pylori confirmed by histology.[16] A written consent was obtained from all participants. The indication of treatment was based on American College of Gastroenterology Guideline on the management of H. pylori infection [17] including peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis, primary gastric MALT lymphoma, and intestinal metaplasia. Authors randomized participants using a computer program. Exclusion criteria of the study were age below 18 and more than 80, history of renal and liver diseases, allergic reaction to the treatment, history of constant NSAID use, pregnancy, and use of antibiotics for 4 weeks before the study. Group (A) was treated with clarithromycin (500 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg), and esomeprazole (20 mg), each at every 12 h for 14 days,[1] while Group (B) was treated with levofloxacin (500 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg), esomeprazole (20 mg), each at every 12 h for 14 days.[1] After finishing the treatment period, participants were invited to the clinic for checking drugs side effects. To confirm patient compliance, we asked the patients to bring their remaining medication and counted the rest of their pills. Participants who took at least 90% of their administered drugs were considered as good compliance. Side effects such as headache, nausea, and vomiting were detected by self-report of patients. All participants underwent upper endoscopy after 6 weeks of treatment completion. During endoscopy, five biopsies were retrieved as follows: two from the antrum, one from the incisura, and two from gastric body.[18] All biopsy samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Giemsa [19] in the pathology department. The pathologists were blinded to the treatment arm, and all results were confirmed by two pathologists. Data entry were conducted by a trained doctor, and variables included participants' demographics, smoking history, medications history, findings of physical examinations, endoscopy, and results of biopsy after the treatment completion in a questionnaire. Numerical data were shown as mean and qualitative data expressed as a ratio. Statistical tools such as the Chi-square test and t-test were used at appropriate places, and statistical significance was calculated with a two-tailed test. A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done by the R [20] statistics software.


   Results Top


A total of 452 patients were found to have H. pylori gastric infection which was confirmed by biopsy. Eighty treatment-naive patients were enrolled in this study (40 patients for each group) and three patients from each group were lost to follow-up; [Figure 1] and [Table 1] summarizes the baseline characteristics of the patients. The gender, mean age, and Drug side effects were similar between treatment groups, except Rash, which occurred more frequently in the Levofloxacin group 13 patients in Group (A) were cured, with an eradication rate of 35.1% according to per-protocol analysis (PPA) and 32.5% according to intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), while in Group (B), 11 patients were cured, with an eradication rate of 29.7% PPA and 27.5% ITT with P = 0.80.
Figure 1: Flow of the study

Click here to view
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients

Click here to view


Odds ratio [21],[22] with 95% confidence interval according to ITT was 0.788 [0.302,2.005]., while the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval according to PPA was 0.781 [0.294,2.037].


   Discussion Top


Our study shows that the resistance rate is high in both treatment protocols. Globally, the rate of H. pylori clarithromycin resistance ranges from 5.46% to 30.8%,[23] and the occurrence of resistance is increasing worldwide with the highest rate in Asian countries. In early 2017, the World Health Organization listed H. pylori as clarithromycin-resistant bacteria.[15],[24] The rate of levofloxacin resistance was 25.28% and it was higher in Asia compared to Europe (15%). The incidence of amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori seems to increase in South America (97.5%) and Asia,[23],[25] which can be explained by macrolides in treating upper respiratory infections and fluoroquinolones in treating urinary tract infections. There are many factors that may explain the resistance in treatment of H. pylori-like mechanisms of resistance developed by H. pylori to antibiotic used in the treatment of infection, such as the presence or absence of cagA gene.[26] Gender women are developing resistance to clarithromycin, while males are developing resistance to levofloxacin,[13] and finally, with regard to the patients' age, the resistance is more common for clarithromycin in children or young adults than it is in older members.[9]

The previous results are unexpected for us, especially for levofloxacin which prompts us to seek effective ways to treat our patients.

Our study has a number of limitations. The sample size, despite the small size of our sample, was the largest size that can be used with pilot studies.[27] Drugs used in this study are locally manufactured, i.e., clarithromycin (KLACID), levofloxacin (FLOXALIVE), amoxicillin (maxicilline), and esomeprazole (esostom). We cannot confirm that the drug resistance was a cause of our results, as we did not culture of an endoscopic biopsy samples because culturing the H. pylori organism is difficult and we do not have this technique. Adherence to medication was from the patient's history. We cannot confirm that all patients were naive to macrolides or fluoroquinolones because there are no detailed medical records for patients in Syria, neither in hospitals nor in the clinic settings. The only method to investigate past medication was to interrogate patients, which was useful if the antibiotics were used for last 2–3 weeks before enrolment. Furthermore, in Syria as in other developing countries, there is a significant misuse of antibiotics, and all antibiotics are easy to get from local pharmacies even without doctor's prescription.[28]


   Conclusions Top


Treatment regimens using locally produced clarithromycin or levofloxacin were equally ineffective in the treatment of H. pylori infections, which may reveal the existence of resistance to the former two drugs. Using therapeutic regimens that do not contain clarithromycin or levofloxacin is a rational option.

Financial support and sponsorship

Unipharma Universal Pharmaceutical Industries.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, Gisbert JP, Forman D, Leontiadis GI, et al. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;12:CD008337.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Eshraghian A. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection among the healthy population in Iran and countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review of prevalence and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:17618-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kusters JG, van Vliet AH, Kuipers EJ. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:449-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sgouras DN, Trang TT, Yamaoka Y. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2015;20:8-16.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1175-86.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ford AC, Forman D, Hunt R, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. Helicobacter pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;7:CD005583.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Venerito M, Vasapolli R, Rokkas T, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal malignancies. Helicobacter 2015;20 Suppl 1:36-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ford AC, Gurusamy KS, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P. Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4:CD003840.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Agudo S, Pérez-Pérez G, Alarcón T, López-Brea M. High prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains and risk factors associated with resistance in Madrid, Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3703-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Alba C, Blanco A, Alarcón T. Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2017;30:489-97.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Khademi F, Poursina F, Hosseini E, Akbari M, Safaei HG. Helicobacter pylori in Iran: A systematic review on the antibiotic resistance. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2015;18:2-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kuo YT, Liou JM, El-Omar EM, Wu JY, Leow AH, Goh KL, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:707-15.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Saracino IM, Zullo A, Holton J, Castelli V, Fiorini G, Zaccaro C, et al. High prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates in Italy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2012;21:363-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vianna JS, Ramis IB, Ramos DF, Vong A, Silva PE. Drug resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Arq Gastroenterol 2016;53:215-23.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lim SG, Park RW, Shin SJ, Yoon D, Kang JK, Hwang JC, et al. The relationship between the failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori and previous antibiotics use. Dig Liver Dis 2016;48:385-90.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tongtawee T, Kaewpitoon S, Kaewpitoon N, Dechsukhum C, Leeanansaksiri W, Loyd RA, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:1631-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Chey WD, Wong BC, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. American college of gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1808-25.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Satoh K, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y, Kihira K, Takimoto T, Saifuku K, et al. Biopsy sites suitable for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and the assessment of the extent of atrophic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:569-73.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lee JY, Kim N. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori by invasive test: Histology. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kirkwood B, Sterne J. Comparing two proportions. Essential Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Massachusetts, USA: Wiley; 2003. p. 148-64.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health 2008;53:165-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ghotaslou R, Leylabadlo HE, Asl YM. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A recent literature review. World J Methodol 2015;5:164-74.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Geneva World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/. [Last updated on 2017 Feb 27].  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
De Francesco V, Giorgio F, Hassan C, Manes G, Vannella L, Panella C, et al. Worldwide H. Pylori antibiotic resistance: A systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2010;19:409-14.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Blaser MJ, Berg DE. Helicobacter pylori genetic diversity and risk of human disease. J Clin Invest 2001;107:767-73.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res 2016;25:1057-73.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Fallone CA, Chiba N, van Zanten SV, Fischbach L, Gisbert JP, Hunt RH, et al. The toronto consensus for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Gastroenterology 2016;151:51-6.e14.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in 2018
Neil R. OśMorain,Maria P. Dore,Anthony J. P. OśConnor,Javier P. Gisbert,Colm A. OśMorain
Helicobacter. 2018; 23: e12519
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Neuroprotective effect of crocin on substantia nigra in MPTP-induced Parkinsonís disease model of mice
Parisa Haeri,Abbas Mohammadipour,Zahra Heidari,Alireza Ebrahimzadeh-bideskan
Anatomical Science International. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2702    
    Printed35    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded164    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal