Avicenna Journal of Medicine

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 106--108

Management of sizeable carotid body tumor: Case report and review of literature


Mohamed A Elsharawy1, Hind Alsaif2, Aymen Elsaid1, Ali Kredees1,  
1 Department of Surgery, University of Dammam, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Radiology, University of Dammam, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed A Elsharawy
Professor Vascular Surgery, Al-Khobar - 31952, Eastern Province
Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Carotid body tumor is a paraganglioma derived from the neural crest. It arises from the carotid body which acts as a vascular chemoreceptors and is usually located at the carotid bifurcation. Sizeable (Shamblin III, >5 cm size) tumors are large and typically encase the carotid artery requiring vessel resection and replacement. Management of such tumors carries a high risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity rates specially with regards to neurovascular complications. We report a case of sizeable tumor which was surgically removed with minimal complications.



How to cite this article:
Elsharawy MA, Alsaif H, Elsaid A, Kredees A. Management of sizeable carotid body tumor: Case report and review of literature.Avicenna J Med 2013;3:106-108


How to cite this URL:
Elsharawy MA, Alsaif H, Elsaid A, Kredees A. Management of sizeable carotid body tumor: Case report and review of literature. Avicenna J Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 15 ];3:106-108
Available from: http://www.avicennajmed.com/text.asp?2013/3/4/106/120503


Full Text

 Introduction



CBT is a rare neck tumor that is derived from the neural crest. [1] Management of sizeable (Shamblin III, >5 cm size) tumors carries a high risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity rates specially with regards to neurovascular complications. [2] We report a case of sizeable tumor which was surgically removed with minimal blood loss, temporary neurological loss, and no cerebro vascular complications. No preoperative embolization was performed. Review of literature [3] and our case reveals that proper surgical technique is the key to improve treatment outcome.

 Case Report



A 40-year-old Yemini woman was admitted to King Fahd Hospital of University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia with a progressively growing mass in the left anterolateral side of her neck of 5 years duration. She presented with neck tenderness, dizziness, increasing number of fainting attacks, and shortness of breath. There was no history of hoarseness, dysphagia, or palpitation and no family history of a similar condition. Her left pupil was slightly more contracted than the right pupil (Horner's syndrome). The rest of her neurologic examination was unremarkable. Indirect laryngoscopy revealed slightly impaired movement of left vocal cord. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan of the neck with subsequent CT angiograms of the carotids showed a 6.9 × 5 × 5.8 cm hypervascular solid left carotid space mass encasing the common carotid artery (CCA) and both internal CA (ICA) and external CA (ECA) and splaying the carotid bifurcation with no luminal narrowing or thrombosis [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. There was no contralateral tumor. The tumor was diagnosed as carotid body paraganglioma of Shamblin group III. Horner's syndrome was due to tumor encasement of the left sympathetic chain. No preoperative embolization was performed. The tumor was surgically removed under locoregional anesthesia and supplemented with intravenous propofol after reconstruction of the CA. The hypoglossal and vagus nerves were identified during surgery and preserved. Part of CCA, ICA, and ECA were removed with tumor and ICA was reconstructed with polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) graft [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Monitoring of the neurological status was achieved by simple clinical evaluation of the state of consciousness under local anesthesia, and by continuous regional oxygen saturation (rSO2), measured with a cerebral oximeter (Somanetics Invos cerebral oximeter). It was not necessary to place a shunt. Blood loss was about 450 ml. Postoperatively, a transient swallowing difficulty and tongue deviation developed probably due to stretching of the hypoglossal nerve during the operation. On laryngoscopic examination, left-sided vocal cord paralysis was aggravated. There was no cerebrovascular event after surgery. Histopathology examination confirmed the preoperative diagnosis of paraganglioma [Figure 5]. Six months after surgery, the patient could speak and swallow normally and her tongue deviation disappeared. Graft surveillance at 9 months revealed a patent graft with normal flow.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}

 Discussion



CBT is a paraganglioma arising from the carotid body which acts as a vascular chemoreceptors and is usually located at the carotid bifurcation. [2] Although most of CBT are benign and slow growing, early excision is recommended because of the unpredictable malignancy potential. Even if the tumor is not pathologically malignant, it will continue to grow and can cause various complications and will become too difficult for a surgeon to remove without complications. [4] In 1971, Shamblin et al., introduced a classification system based on the size of the tumor into groups I, II, and III. [5] Group III, like the present case, consists of tumors that are large and typically encase the CA requiring vessel resection and replacement. Most of the previous studies reported high rate of neurovascular complication (23-47%) [2],[6],[7] with Shamblin III tumors. The risk seems to be more significant when the tumor size is more than 5 cm [8] (similar to the present case). Therefore, early detection and prompt surgical resection of CBTs will decrease surgical morbidity. [2] Nevertheless, early detection of the small tumor is difficult because of the limited clinical symptoms during its early stage. [9]

In large tumors, neurovascular symptoms and signs, such as hoarseness, vocal cord paralysis, dysphasia, Horner's syndrome, carotid pulsations, thrill, and symptoms of cerebral ischemia or carotid sinus syndrome, are usually present. [9] In this case, Horner's syndrome was detected.

Noninvasive imaging studies like CT scan with contrast and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful modalities to identify CBT. [10] In our case, CT with contrast was enough for the diagnosis. CT demonstrated a solid mass that showed homogenous enhancement on intravenous contrast administration. The presence of uniform contrast enhancement and large feeding vessels into the tumor excludes enlarged lymph nodes and schwannomas. Carotid angiography can demonstrate the tumor hypervascularity and widening of the carotid bifurcation by a well-defined tumor blush ("Lyre sign"), which is a pathognominic angiographic finding. Selective embolization can be used to reduce the size of tumor and bleeding complications during surgery. [11] However, other studies showed that embolization has no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss or operation time [2] and was not effective in reducing neurological complications. [12] In our case there were multiple arteries supplying the tumor making super selective embolization very difficult. Fortunately, blood loss was not significant.

Cerebrovascular accidents are the most serious postoperative complication and have been reported to be up to 11%. [13] The balloon test occlusion of the ICA was not performed in this case since its predictive value is low. [14] We did not have to use carotid shunt since neurological status and rSO2 were maintained normal during the whole procedure. There was no evidence of vascular insufficiency after surgery. Although autogenous vein graft has better patency rates than PTFE in peripheral arterial bypasses, [15] this advantage was not confirmed for CA bypasses. [3],[16] The incidence of cranial nerve injury is reported as high as 40%. [17] The hypoglossal and vagus nerves are the most vulnerable to injury. [2] Both nerves were identified and preserved in the present case.

In conclusion, despite the development of surgical and endovascular techniques, huge carotid body paraganglioma continue to have high incidence of pre- and postoperative complications. Carotid body paraganglioma should be removed immediately upon detection. Identification of the adjacent nerves during surgery is essential in reducing postoperative problems.

References

1Avgerinos ED, Moulakakis K, Brountzos E, Giannakopoulos TG, Lazaris AM, Koumarianou A, et al. Advances in assessment and management of carotid body tumors. Vascular 2011;19:250-6.
2Lim JY, Kim J, Kim SH, Lee S, Lim YC, Kim JW, et al. Surgical treatment of carotid body paragangliomas: Outcomes and complications according to the Shamblin classification. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010;3:91-5.
3Davidovic L, Ilic N, Dimitrijevic M, Dukic V, Dzodic R. Surgical management of cervical paragagangliomas. Am Surg 2008;74:1171-6.
4Dimakakos PB, Kotsis TE. Carotid body paraganglioma: Review and surgical management. Eur J Plast Surg 2001;24:58-65.
5Shamblin WR, ReMine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG Jr. Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma). Clinicopathologic analysis of ninety cases. Am J Surg 1971;122:732-9.
6Westerband A, Hunter GC, Cintora I, Coulthard SW, Hinni ML, Gentile AT, et al. Current trends in the detection and management of carotid body tumors. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:84-92.
7Wang SJ, Wang MB, Barauskas TM, Calcaterra TC. Surgical management of carotid body tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:202-6.
8Singh D, Pinjala RK, Reddy RC, Satya Vani PV. Management for carotid body paragangliomas. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:692-5.
9Park SJ, Kim YS, Cho HR, Kwon TW. Huge carotid body paraganglioma. J Korean Surg Soc 2011;81:291-4.
10Carroll W, Stenson K, Stringer S. Malignant carotid body tumor. Head Neck 2004;26:301-6.
11Persky MS, Setton A, Niimi Y, Hartman J, Frank D, Berenstein A. Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck paragangliomas: A team approach. Head Neck 2002;24:423-31.
12Sen I, Stephen E, Malepathi K, Agarwal S, Shyamkumar NK, Mammen S. Neurological complications in carotid body tumors: A 6-year single-center experience. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:64-8S.
13Sajid MS, Hamilton G, Baker DM. Joint Vascular Research Group. A multicenter review of carotid body tumor management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34:127-30.
14Segal DH, Sen C, Bederson JB, Catalano P, Sacher M, Stollman AL, et al. Predictive value of Balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Skull Base Surg 1995;5:97-107.
15Solakoviæ E, Totiæ D, Solakoviæ S. Femoro-popliteal bypass above knee with saphenous vein vs. synthetic graft. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2008;8:367-72.
16Miao B, Lu Y, Pan X, Liu D. Carotid artery resection and reconstruction with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 2008;118:2135-8.
17Por YC, Lim DT, Teoh MK, Soo KC. Surgical management and outcome of carotid body tumors. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002;31:141-4.